First the guidelines suggest making your
Jan 10, 2024 1:59:03 GMT -5
Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 1:59:03 GMT -5
it will be eligible for a “Highly Meets” rating. It can do this both for general queries (for example a page on the company website that lists all the products of a certain type) and for a single specific product. “Slightly Meets” and “Fails to Meet” Google also wants its raters to look if the content is outdated, if it is too general for the topic of the page and if it is created without any kind of expertise: all these signals make it low quality and unreliable. Dated content and updated content For some time now there has been a
tendency to make content appear more recent than it actually is, for example by changing the Malaysia Phone Number List date without changing anything significant on the page. Other webmasters instead update their old content , without changing the original publication date. Google now takes this into account, and asks quality raters to verify via the Wayback Machine whether and how these changes were made. “Heavy” monetization YMYL sites often aim to monetize heavily. Google asks its raters to evaluate whether this distracts the user from the main content. If you have sites of this type, therefore try to balance monetization with usability (if you don't want to risk it). Summing up and concluding 1.
site mobile-friendly (if it isn't already). If it is not, it already risks ranking worse in queries made via smartphone. And it also seems that Google considers mobile-friendliness as a "sign of quality": maybe you have an excellent site, with quality content, but if it's not mobile-friendly Google might not like it too much. 2. Gary Illyes said that you have to make sure you answer the user's question if you want to get featured snippets . But apart from that, I remind you that from Hummingbird onwards your site and pages should comprehensively respond to user intent. 3. Think about how your supplemental content integrates with your main content.
tendency to make content appear more recent than it actually is, for example by changing the Malaysia Phone Number List date without changing anything significant on the page. Other webmasters instead update their old content , without changing the original publication date. Google now takes this into account, and asks quality raters to verify via the Wayback Machine whether and how these changes were made. “Heavy” monetization YMYL sites often aim to monetize heavily. Google asks its raters to evaluate whether this distracts the user from the main content. If you have sites of this type, therefore try to balance monetization with usability (if you don't want to risk it). Summing up and concluding 1.
site mobile-friendly (if it isn't already). If it is not, it already risks ranking worse in queries made via smartphone. And it also seems that Google considers mobile-friendliness as a "sign of quality": maybe you have an excellent site, with quality content, but if it's not mobile-friendly Google might not like it too much. 2. Gary Illyes said that you have to make sure you answer the user's question if you want to get featured snippets . But apart from that, I remind you that from Hummingbird onwards your site and pages should comprehensively respond to user intent. 3. Think about how your supplemental content integrates with your main content.
